<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Ashley Grayson Literary Agency Blog &#187; Query</title>
	<atom:link href="http://graysonagency.com/blog/category/query/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://graysonagency.com/blog</link>
	<description>Agents, Publishers, Business, and your book</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Jul 2010 17:20:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The ultimate agent query, NOT!</title>
		<link>http://graysonagency.com/blog/query/the-ultimate-agent-query-not/</link>
		<comments>http://graysonagency.com/blog/query/the-ultimate-agent-query-not/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 18:45:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Agents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Query]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://graysonagency.com/blog/?p=144</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Aspiring book-deal-seekers are aggressively refining their query letters, and I don&#8217;t mean that in a good way. Here are two recent email queries that I received that demonstrate the energy with which people seek agents and want book deals. Notice: I didn&#8217;t say they were authors. What is becoming evident, is how focused and minimalist [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aspiring book-deal-seekers are aggressively refining their query letters, and I don&#8217;t mean that in a good way. Here are two recent email queries that I received that demonstrate the energy with which people seek agents and want book deals. Notice: I didn&#8217;t say they were authors. What is becoming evident, is how focused and minimalist queries have become.</p>
<p>The first sender opened with this line: &#8220;Fiction books in general have always been and will continue to be a favorite in the world of books and reading.&#8221; That&#8217;s an exact quote. I replied that &#8220;fiction books are called novels,&#8221; and declined to pursue the query. I quickly got a snarky reply: &#8220;Didn&#8217;t ask for your critique on it &#8211; FICTION books in general are not necessarily NOVELS!&#8221;</p>
<p>This illustrates two key aspects of publishing today. First, people yearning for book-deals, presume that the act of submission is a demand for acceptance, not an invitation to critique. I guess I didn&#8217;t get the memo. Second, while not all fiction is of novel length, authors are generally picky about words, and always say what they mean. Book-deal-seekers really don&#8217;t know what books are or take the time to use the appropriate word for the idea they think they have.</p>
<p>My second example of the new minimalist query, is actually a composite one, inspired by this morning&#8217;s query for a collection of short biographies. The query sender was actually quite literate and sensible and proposed a not bad idea. But the query was formed of three parts:</p>
<p>1.) A pretty catchy title, 2.) a brief author bio and 3.) the request to &#8220;imagine a bestselling book here.&#8221; No hint of an approach to the topic or content was included.</p>
<p>This got me recalling an increasing number of novel queries I&#8217;ve seen in the past few months. These unhappy queries exhibit this pattern:</p>
<p>1.) A brief selection of familiar scenarios from the genre, or &#8220;important&#8221; themes, like isolation, grief or love, if the novel is literary.</p>
<p>2.) Micro character bios of the major characters and sometimes a list of the cities in which the action takes place.</p>
<p>3.) The exhortation to &#8220;imagine a great story here,&#8221; but no actual hint of a story or plot.</p>
<p>I decline this sort of query, because I don&#8217;t have time to look for unexpressed virtue in prose. Nor do I enquire at a Sushi Resturant if they serve fish. I expect the author and chef to know what they are about.</p>
<p>Sad to say, I&#8217;m also seeing this trend appear in published novels. Usually hot-genre, trendy novels, bought for marketing purposes by Publishers so they can have a certain kind of book on their lists. In the novel form, the appeal to the reader becomes: &#8220;imagine some great dialog here.&#8221;</p>
<p>I&#8217;m tempted to respond with: &#8220;Imagine wild-eyed appreciation for your work, which alas, we cannot take on for reasons totally unrelated to the words you wrote.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://graysonagency.com/blog/query/the-ultimate-agent-query-not/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
